The article discusses the detailed underdrawing in the Triptych, emphasizing its importance in the painting process. It mentions how the initial drawing was meticulously done by a patient collaborator and then further developed by more experienced hands.
The characteristics of the underdrawing in the Triptych are compared to works by Metsys and his workshop, highlighting differences in visibility and line quality. The study utilized infrared reflectography to analyze the underdrawing, revealing extensive details not previously observed in Metsys’ works.
The underdrawing of the Triptych is described as extensive and crucial for understanding the painting’s creation. The study contrasts the underdrawing of the Triptych with other works attributed to Metsys, noting differences in visibility and line characteristics. The underdrawing of anatomical elements in the Triptych’s figures is discussed, highlighting deviations in hair depiction compared to the final painting.
Reflectographs obtained using advanced imaging technology were used to analyze the underdrawing, providing high-resolution images for comparison with existing literature. The study aims to contribute to the general characterization of paintings attributed to Metsys and his workshop, shedding light on authorship attribution issues.
Overall, the article delves into the intricate details of the underdrawing in the Triptych, offering insights into the painting techniques of the time and the artistic practices of Metsys and his contemporaries.
The research findings provide valuable information for art historians and conservationists studying works from this period, enhancing our understanding of the creative processes behind these masterpieces.
